Did History Actually Teach Us Anything? - Episode 23 The Great Fire of Rome

Laura: Welcome to "Did History Actually Teach Us Anything?" 
The podcast where we unravel the most well-known tales of calamity, mishap, and unforeseen consequences that have shaped the course of history, and consider whether we've actually learned anything from them all these years later.. 
In this podcast, we examine the historical events that you may think you know about already and the causes that led to them, be they icebergs or bakers ovens. 
We will consider whether these tragedies could have been avoided, and some of the surprising things we do differently now as a result. 
But this podcast, isn't just about dates and events. It's about learning from the past, drawing insights from hindsight, and gaining a deeper appreciation for the complexities of what really happened in these events we think we know so well. 
So get ready to encounter remarkable individuals, pivotal moments and fascinating insights that will make you appreciate health and safety and environmental management as far more than just red tape. 
In this episode, we examined the Great Fire of Rome, which erupted on July the 18th 64AD, near the Circus Maximus, and burned for nine days. The fire devastated the city, destroying or damaging 10 of Rome's 14 districts and leaving hundreds of thousands homeless.
Its cause still remains debated - from accidental origins to deliberate arson, and even allegations against Emperor Nero himself.
We'll explore how the fire spread so rapidly, what daily life was like for Romans in 64AD, and the lessons learned that shaped future urban planning and fire safety.
Joining us is Simon, one of our health and safety experts, who will begin by explaining the conditions that allowed this fire to unfold.

Simon: In the summer of 64AD, the heart of the Roman Empire was devastated by the Great Fire of Rome. Thought to have started in the merchant area of the city near the Circus Maximus, the fire quickly spread. Strong winds fanned the flames, and the abundance of flammable with materials fed the fire's endless appetite. The fire swiftly consumed all that was in its path and engulfed the city, eventually damaging or destroying 10 of Rome's 14 districts over 9 days of terror, destruction and death.
Although we often consider Roman architecture to consist of ornate carved marble pillars and luxurious baths and spas, the reality was that much of the city at the time was made up of densely packed wooden buildings lining narrow winding streets. Like many modern cities, the population consisted of those with wealth and power but the majority were citizens working hard to make a living and support themselves and their families. As the fire spread and the destruction grew, it was witnessed by a young boy, Tacitus. Already an elite member of society, he grew to become of great importance and wrote about the Great Fire. He recorded the 'terrified shrieking of women, helpless old and young, people intent on their own safety, people unselfishly supporting invalids or waiting for them', showing the humanity of those affected. He also spoke of gangs taking advantage of the chaos, scenes we still witness today in similar disasters, such as the January 2025 wildfires in the US.
Debates as to the cause of the fire, with theories ranging from natural disasters through to unfortunate and terrible accidental causes, onto deliberate arson and even orders given by the Emperor Nero, who legend would have us believe played the fiddle while Rome burned. Regardless, the Great Fire of Rome left a population of about 1,000,000 people in chaos with an estimated 200,000 homeless and thousands dead, prompting efforts to rebuild and improve fire safety measures in the future. In the aftermath of the fire, countless more were persecuted as Nero deemed that Christians were the cause of the fire.

Laura: So Simon, what would life have been like for Romans in 64AD?

Simon: When we think about Rome and the Roman Empire, we often conjure up images of opulence of the empire, with mosaic floors and extravagant buildings housing marble statues, around which inhabitants lived a luxurious life. The reality however, was very different for the 'average' citizen. Life was spent in cramped apartments often over multiple levels, built from low cost materials and using basic construction techniques. These buildings, known as insulae, were often overcrowded and not maintained. Similar to many modern cities, work ranged from the low paid to positions considered to be more powerful and influential, with slavery playing a significant role in the Empire.
Regardless of the perceived social status, there were shared activities and values that made a Roman, Roman. The importance of the evening family meal, shared activities in the baths and Colosseum events allowed communities to come together. The prevalence of religion was also shared, with households having shrines for their family to which they prayed and gave their offerings. The public worship of a range of Gods allowed for further gatherings and rituals, including sacrifice, and communal meals were common.
Emperor Nero rose to power at just 16 in 54AD, and to the residents of Rome, especially the poor, he was by some accounts a popular emperor, with many of his actions benefiting them. He oversaw the construction of public structures and improved access to food and connections across the city to allow better access. However, those who recorded his reign more formally paint a different image: one of a tyrant, who murdered his own mother and the hand in the Great Fire, and watched the city burn whilst playing his lyre and singing - a story we know now to be fictional, but one like so many that has created the legends and folklore that surround so many Roman Emperors. When and how the rumours started are hard to prove, but if they were being shared during or immediately after the fire, it would be hard to imagine how any of the citizens would've had faith in their emperor to protect them.

Laura: What do we know about what actually started the Great Fire of Rome - and how did the way Romans lived and build their cities make it spread so quickly?

Simon: We often consider the concept of health and safety as a new thing, but the hazards we experienced today share many similarities to those of Ancient Rome nearly 2,000 years ago. The Great Fire of Rome was contributed by several health and safety factors related to the city's architecture and infrastructure, and arguably the learning we can take from that disaster is as relevant today as it was two millennia ago.
The use of highly combustible construction materials across the majority of structures in Rome, primarily wood, contributed significantly to the rapid spread of the fire. This lack of fire-resistant materials and building standards made the city especially vulnerable to large scale conflagrations. Even in more recent devastating and horrendous modern fires, the widespread use of combustible construction materials is still cited as a major cause.
Similarly, the crowded and dense urban layout of Rome, characterised by narrow streets and tightly clustered buildings, made it challenging for residents to escape and for firefighters to control the spread of the flames. The close proximity of buildings facilitated the quick transmission of the fire from one structure to another - factors that unfortunately still resonate today when fires are investigated, hopefully not on the city-wide scale, but still true in micro-communities. 
Rome also lacked organized fire brigade and protocols for fire prevention, leading to a lack of comprehensive building codes or regulations to mitigate fire risk. Firefighting tools and techniques were basic and not standardised. Technology has certainly improved, as have firefighting techniques and the training of professional services, but there is still often a disconnect in standards and approaches.
Moreover, the city's water infrastructure was insufficient to combat a large-scale fire, with limited water sources available for fire-fighting. The absence of a coordinated system for water distribution further hampered containment efforts during the Great Fire of Rome - another headline that we have seen in the January 2025 Los Angeles fires almost 2,000 years after the Great Fire of Rome, and one which caused debate and argument in the US. 
These combined factors underscore the importance of robust health and safety measures in urban planning and construction to prevent or mitigate catastrophic fires like the one that devastated Ancient Rome and are clearly just as relevant today as they were 2,000 ago.

Laura: So is there anything that could have been done to prevent the fire? 

Simon: There are potentially things that could have been done to avoid the Great Fire of Rome, depending upon the cause.

If we were to consider the fire as a deliberate act of arson, then perhaps those causes could have been avoided. If a disgruntled citizen with little to nothing to lose chose to start the fire in protest at how they were treated or the conditions in which they lived, then through the development of better social infrastructures the arson could have perhaps been avoided, or at least reduced. Social unrest and feelings of injustice are even today cited as a motivation for acts of violence and disorder, with attack from public buildings and perceived seats of power often being targeted. 
The rumors of Nero starting the fire, be that to punish his citizens, or as some suggested to create space for his vision of Rome, whilst unfounded, offer an opportunity to consider the hypothetical. The desire to lead without challenge and to eliminate all opposition are often seen in ancient leaders, and their ruthlessness has become something of legend. It is perhaps then easy to understand how those seeking privilege or protection would find it hard to disobey the orders given to them, no matter how obscene they may appear. That personal desire for self-preservation or progression is again a human trait we often witness in those guilty of the most atrocious acts against humanity. This was also seen after the fire, as in an attempt for self-preservation, Nero blame the Christians for the fire to deflect criticism from himself.
Regardless of the cause, there are almost definitely things that could have been done to mitigate the impact of the blaze. For example, the improvement of urban planning by creating more spacious street layouts, enforcing building codes for fire-resistant materials, and regulating the distance between structures could have slowed the spread of the fire. These factors were again contributory 1600 years later in the Great Fire of London, which is covered in another episode of this podcast.
Establishing fire prevention measures such as regular safety inspections, enforcement of fire safety standards, and the formation of fire brigades might have helped prevent the ignition and spread of fire.
Enhancements to the city's water supply system, including the creation of reservoirs or systems for firefighting purposes, and improvements in water distribution networks, could have aided in controlling fires. 
Public education and awareness initiatives about fire safety practices and emergency evacuation procedures might have increased readiness and awareness in the event of a fire.
Additionally, implementing early warning systems, such as lookout towers or alarm bells, could have facilitated quicker responses to fires, allowing for their containment before they grew out of control.
Through these proactive measures, it is possible that the Great Fire of Rome could have been avoided or its devastating impact significantly reduced.

Laura: What changes did Rome make after the fire to prevent something like this from happening again, and how have those lessons shaped the way we plan and protect our cities today? 

Simon: In the aftermath of the fire, the relief efforts showed the compassion of the Empire and indeed Nero himself, who opened up public buildings and other areas to offer relief.
Food was shipped in from neighbouring areas and food prices dropped, although many actions of Nero and those around him were less gracious and cost many more lives of those deemed to be responsible for the fire.
In the aftermath of the fire, the ways in which towns and cities were planned, along with wider urban planning, construction practices and fire safety measures were all impacted and processes and practices changed. Lessons learned from the disaster included the importance of using fire-resistant materials in building construction, creating spacious street layouts to limit the spread of fires, implementing fire prevention protocols, enhancing water infrastructure for firefighting purposes, and increasing public awareness and readiness for fire incidents.
The reach of the Roman Empire over the centuries that followed undoubtedly allowed them to share their technology and knowledge across much of Europe. However, like so much of what they shared and introduced, it was lost as the Roman Empire shrunk and withdrew back towards what is now Italy. This meant so much of what was learnt was lost in the midst of time, and as new empires, regimes, monarchies and others battled for control over the millennia and a half after the Great Fire of Rome. However, as we look to modern society, many of the lessons from the Great Fire of Rome are evident today as cities now prioritise fire safety in urban planning and construction with building codes, emphasizing fire-resistant materials, and controlling how and where we build.
Fire prevention measures, organised fire-fighting brigades, and early detection systems are key components of modern urban safety protocols. 
Water infrastructure has been improved to ensure an efficient water supply for firefighting needs.
Public education campaigns on fire safety practices and emergency procedures continue to be crucial in enhancing public preparedness for fire incidents.
Overall, the impact of the Great Fire of Rome has led to lasting changes in urban fire safety practices and planning strategies, although as recent disasters have shown us, that journey is still ongoing and lessons still need to be actioned and the improvements made.
The development and growth of safety and health is ever evolving and learning should and must be continuous. Even 2,000 years on, the Great Fire of Rome can teach us and inform modern day thinking. 

Laura: Thanks for joining us on this episode of "Did History Actually Teach Us Anything?". If you enjoyed this episode, please follow our social media channels, leave us a rating and review, and share our podcast with anyone who wants to learn more about the risky side of history. 
And don't forget to subscribe so you'll get the next episode as soon as it's available. Join us next time to learn whether history did actually teach us anything...